Current Fiction

How many books in a brain?

That is, how many books have you read? How many books have you read that you remember well? Do you know a lot about books and authors you haven’t read?

I’ve been plunging into the topic of readers’ advisory in public libraries, in the hope of someday having a better library job than I have now. And let me tell you, this is a moment in which I am glad that this blog is pseudonymous (and if that isn’t a word, it should be. Oh, good. Merriam-Webster online says it is. Digression over.).

Because sometimes I’m not sure what I think about readers’ advisory practices in libraries. There is this emphasis on keeping current, on genre fiction, and most difficult of all, a dismissive attitude toward knowing about more classic works of literature.

I, for one, would hate to sit there at a reference desk, in a library chock full of books, and admit that I don’t know who wrote Middlemarch. Or that I don’t know which Dickens novel has Philip Pirrip as the protagonist. Or that I don’t know who is the author of the Hercule Poirot mystery stories. There’s a basic level of cultural literacy in the world of books, and knowing something about the classics seems to me to be a basic necessity for achieving that level.

To my mind, classic books have become classics because they have remained popular (okay, popular enough) for decades and centuries. So this designation of “popular fiction” really irritates me. It seems that a lot of public libraries emphasize current popular fiction, sadly at the expense of classic popular fiction. If you’ll allow me the term “classic popular fiction.” And you will, because this is my blog.

Why is thisCan one human brain have a competent knowledge of English literature AND memorize the names and genres of a whole bunch of New York Times bestsellers? How much about books do you really have to know? Do you have to know about books you hate? Well, yes, I suppose you do. But how much can a human brain hold?

Furthermore, lists of bestsellers change all the time. But it will always be true that Agatha Christie wrote Murder on the Orient Express and that Sherlock Holmes meets John Watson for the first time in Arthur Conan Doyle’s A Study in Scarlet.

The idea that providing readers’ advisory services means a constant process of learning and forgetting what’s popular during any given week sounds really exhausting to me.

Maybe I’m being an overachiever and taking all this way too seriously. I do have a tendency to do that.

What do you think? Should “classic popular fiction” be a thing?

Love you & leave you,

Hobbie DeHoy

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. It depends on how much i liked the book. I am a huge fan of Haruki Murakami so i remember even tiny details and i have many pades memorized unintentionally. But there are hundreds of other books that i can only recall the title. I would rather re-read something i enjoyed greatly than force myself to finish a mediocre book.

    1. Yes, definitely…which is why I’ve read Mansfield Park (and Jane Austen’s five other novels) more times than I can count! I am having a lot of fun exploring genre fiction right now. And hooray, Haruki Murakami is on my list of “international authors,” so I have the pleasure of discovering his work before me! Do you have a favorite?

  2. What do we mean by the term “classic”? Is it a book that has been read for the past 50 years at a minimum? Some books are referred to as “new classic,” and that is an oxymoron. I have been an avid reader for more than 80 years, devouring both classics and new books, some of which may become “classics.” I do like to re-read some of them and realize how I have changed since the last time. For instance, when “Catcher in the Rye” first came out, I was not enchanted. The second time I read it, some twenty years later, I was so bored with all the self-indulgence that I just tossed it aside. We are all individual in our tastes, and Hurrah for Individual Differences!

    1. It’s so hard to define the term “classic,” isn’t it? It seems so subjective, and the definition I came up with above uses “decades or centuries” as a time frame. How many decades? I’m willing to grant any book published in the first half of the twentieth century that is still being read classic status, so it looks like your suggestion of “the past 50 years at a minimum” feels about right to me. Of course, others may disagree, because that’s what we do when we talk about books! And it’s certainly true that different books speak to us in different ways at different times in our lives. I admire Fanny Price more and more as I get older, because the older I get the younger she stays, and her powers of observation are really astonishing for such a young woman.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s